Sunday, July 5, 2009

Module 3: South Carolina Slave Codes

Module 3: South Carolina Slave Codes

In the early 1700s, rice plantations thrived in the colony of South Carolina. How did this successful economy get its start? It was initially taught to the English settlers by the Africans who had grown rice in their homeland. In addition to their familiarity with growing rice, Africans adapted to the hot, humid climate and were somewhat resistant to malaria which was carried by the mosquitoes living in the watery rice fields therefore making them perfect “field workers” (Foner 134). According to Foner, “rice production requires considerable capital investment to drain swamps and crate irrigation systems, it is economically advantageous for rice plantations to be as large as possible.” (134) Hence, South Carolina became a colony of wealthy plantation owners who needed a large number of slaves to work the fields leading to a rapidly growing black population which soon outnumbered the whites. The colonialists, whether intentionally or unintentionally had developed a class system, “The country therefore was not ‘born free’ but born slave and free, servant and master, tenant and landlord, poor and rich.” (Zinn, 39) Outnumbered, but more importantly afraid of losing control, slave owners enacted the Slave Codes of South Carolina for the purpose of defining legal statues and the punishments for broken laws.

In the late 1600s and early 1700s it was common practice for enslaved blacks to be bought and sold throughout the colonies. A successful economy almost always depended on it. “The slaves were taught discipline, were impressed again and again with the ideas of their own inferiority to ‘know their place,’ to see blackness as a sign of subordination, to be awed by the power of the master…” (Zinn 29) Yet plantation owners grew fearful of a rebellion from the growing number of black slaves. The answer was to create laws. In 1690, the “Act for the Better Ordering of Slaves” was enacted declaring specific penalties for first, second, and third offenses. It prohibited enslaved persons from leaving their plantations without written permission. (Slavery) Several years later, in 1712, the “Act for the Better Ordering and Governing of Negroes and Slaves” was created to increase control over the growing number of blacks in South Carolina and outline punishable laws for both master and slave. Punishment for runaway slaves included branding an “R” on their cheek, cutting the Achilles tendon, or even death. It also stated that if the master did not carry out the punishment he would be fined a specified number of shillings. (Slavery) In reality, little was done to actually control the increasing numbers of black slaves as they were needed to ensure a profitable and thriving business. Instead, the Slave Codes were continually revised throughout the 1700s so that the white plantation owners could control the much needed black slave population of South Carolina. “It was an intricate and powerful system of control that the slave owners developed to maintain their labor supply and their way of life…for keeping power and wealth where they are.” (Zinn 29)

According to an Excerpt from American Slavery As It Is, “The fact that thousands of slaves, generally in the prime of life, are annually smuggled into the United States from Africa, Cuba, and elsewhere, makes it manifest that all inferences drawn from the increase of the slave population, which do not make large deductions, for constant importations, must be fallacious. Mr. Middleton of South Carolina, in a speech in Congress in 1819, declared that ‘Thirteen Thousand Africans are Annually Smuggled Into the Southern States.’” (Weld) As a result of profitable rice and later an indigo economy, coupled with South Carolinas ability to control large numbers of black slaves, other colonies such as Georgia adopted the Slave Codes created and enacted by South Carolina’s legislature. (Foner 135) After repealing a ban on slavery, “Georgia became a miniature version of South Carolina. By 1770, as many as 15,000 slaves labored on its coastal rice plantations.” (Foner 135)

Works cited

Foner, Eric. Give Me Liberty! An American History, Seagull Edition. New York: NY, 2009.

"Slavery and Slave Codes (1600-1754)." American Eras. 8 vols. Gale Research, 1997-1998. Reproduced in History Resource Center. Farmington Hills, MI: Gale. http://galenet.galegroup.com.ez.ccclib.org/servlet/HistRC/

Weld, Theodore. "Excerpt from American Slavery As It Is." Reproduced in History Resource Center. Farmington Hills, MI: Gale. http://galenet.galegroup.com.ez.ccclib.org/servlet/HistRC/ (Primary Source)

Zinn, Howard. A People’s History of the United States. Abridged Teaching Edition. New York: NY, 1980.

2 comments:

  1. Hi my name is Lauren and I would first like to start off saying that I chose a topic resembling yours and I feel you did an excellent job stating all the points of the slave code. I also liked how you showed in the beginning how and why south Carolina became such a powerful state. What I would like to expand on is the way you stated there was little to be done to control the slave population.
    I agree with that statement allot. While South Carolina was so concerned about keeping there product rice at a continuous high, I think they forgot about the consequences of the power of the slaves until the end when I think I might have been too late, even though they had the code they came up with in 1740.
    I don’t mean to take away from the extreme success that South Carolina ended up having in the end with there profit I just believe that maybe the stono rebellion could have been prevented if the slaves were keep under control and maybe even treated better.
    I have really enjoyed hearing another point of view of this topic :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi, my name is Jamie I found your blog very interesting and well organized. After reading your blog, I wanted to read the sections on South Carolina in both books, Zinn and Foner again since I had more information. I was compelled to look up the South Carolina Slave Code on the Internet and I found another punishable law for run away slaves.

    In the early 1700s, South Carolina’s economy was successful due to the rice plantations. The African slaves were already familiar with growing rice so they taught the English settlers. The African slaves were able to adapt to their surroundings and they were resistant to malaria that the mosquitoes carried. South Carolina’s black population outnumbered the whites due to the rice plantations needing to be so large for cultivation. The Slave Codes were enacted due to the growing black population and the fear of whites losing control. “South Carolina was the first mainland colony to achieve a black majority. By 1730s (by which time North Carolina had become a separate colony), two-third of its population was black.” African slaves cultivating rice made South Carolina the wealthiest slave owning class on the North American mainland. (Foner 134)

    I agree with you in quoting Zinn 29 “It was an intricate and powerful system of control that the slave owners developed to maintain their labor supply and their way of life…for keeping power and wealth where they are.” The South Carolina XVII proves that they were trying to maintain control over slaves and their future way of life of power and wealth. I found the South Carolina Slave Code, An Act for the better Ordering and Governing (of) Negroes and other Slaves in this Province XVII on Answers.com (http://www.answers.com/topic/south-carolina-slave-code) that came from the West’s Encyclopedia of American Law, “Provided, That one or more of the said slaves who shall be convicted of the crimes or offences aforesaid, where several are concerned, shall be executed for example, to deter others from offending in the like kind.” This punishment was listed for any slave that was guilty of homicide or enticing any slaves to run away. I don’t understand how anyone could compare homicide and enticing slaves to run away to have the same consequences. By having the same punishment this shows you how greedy the colonists were. South Carolina was so fearful of the slaves running away due to the slaves being the most important part of their survival. If they didn’t have the slaves to teach them how to cultivate rice or having slaves maintaining the rice plantations they wouldn’t have been the wealthiest elite in English North America. (Foner 92)

    ReplyDelete